GA-APPROVED 1/17 SEMI-FINAL DRAFT OWS VISION STATEMENT (UPDATED) (158 posts)

Topic tags: approved, Draft, final, GA, goals, occupy, statement, Street, Vision, wall
|
  • Profile picture of Patrick Conway Patrick Conway67p said 4 months ago:

    On a cool, breezy Tuesday evening, in a granite square wet with January rain, the General Assembly of Occupy Wall Street triggered the Vision & Goals working group’s vision statement endgame by giving a unanimous twinkles up to the vision statement presented before them, indicating that it should be brought back, after a week’s notice, for final review and consensus process before the Assembly on Tuesday, January 24th, 2012. (For details on the group’s vision endgame proposal, see here: http://www.nycga.net/groups/vision-and-goals/forum/topic/our-current-plan/.)

    The version of the draft vision statement read before and provisionally approved by the General Assembly on January 17th was the group’s 01/15/12 consensed version, with minor amendments. Four amendments were offered and accepted by the Assembly’s participants; three by direct consensus, and one via straw poll, subsequently ratified by final consensus approval of the entire document. Essentially, the order of the bullet items was amended thrice, ultimately to read as Liberty, People Power, People Before Profit, Fairness, Equality, Justice, Environmental Stewardship & Peace. Previously, the Assembly opined via straw poll that the language in the eighth sentence would best read as “We envision a free, democratic and just society, built on the following principles.” This GA-approved final draft version of the Occupy Wall Street Vision Statement appears directly below, for your review. We ask everyone’s assistance in communicating it as quickly and widely as possible before the 24th of January.

    UPDATE: The V&G team have made a few minor grammatical and punctuation edits, which appear in the updated text below. In addition, at our 1/18 and 1/22 meetings, we consensed on the following potential amendments to suggest to the GA on Tuesday 1/24/12 (changes enclosed in *’s, where appropriate).

    1) Adjust and combine the first two sentences of the preamble to read as follows.
    “We the people of Occupy Wall Street, *in solidarity with the people of the world,* gather *to reaffirm our inalienable rights* to a just society and a flourishing environment for future generations.”

    2) In the Equality bullet, insert the words ‘age’ and ‘disability,’ to read as follows.
    “EQUALITY: whereby we reject all forms of institutionalized discrimination and oppression, on any basis, including but not limited to race, *age,* gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, *disability,* religion, national origin, nationality or economic standing.”

    JANUARY 17th GENERAL ASSEMBLY-APPROVED FINAL DRAFT VISION STATEMENT (Grammar & Punctuation Corrected):

    We the people of Occupy Wall Street gather in the canyons of wealth to reaffirm our inalienable rights. United with the peoples of the world, we declare our rights to a just society and a flourishing environment for future generations.

    Our political and economic systems are broken. Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely, and we live in a world where wealth is power. Our democracy now belongs to the highest bidder. Today, we must remember the lessons of history, restore human dignity and begin anew to build the bonds of trust and goodwill among all.

    From the General Assembly to the people of the world, we offer a Declaration of our Vision for the future.

    We envision a free, democratic and just society, built on the following principles:

    LIBERTY: whereby we secure the full spectrum of human rights – political, civil, economic, social and cultural – against violation or infringement, particularly by unchecked corporate power and unjust governments.

    PEOPLE POWER: whereby governance, in every form and at every level, exists by the will of those governed; where neither wealth nor history alone will justify power; where everyone’s voice is heard, and no one is marginalized.

    PEOPLE BEFORE PROFIT: whereby we value human dignity and needs over monetary gain, elevating them to a place of primary importance; among these are the rights to meaningful and fairly-rewarded work; a decent home; abundant sources of clean air, pure water and natural, nutritious food supplies; and free, comprehensive healthcare and education.

    FAIRNESS: whereby we collectively call on all who enjoy society’s benefits to accept their share of society’s responsibilities; where everyone has an equal opportunity to thrive and power is shared equitably by all so that no one is allowed to exploit, oppress or enslave another.

    EQUALITY: whereby we reject all forms of institutionalized discrimination and oppression, on any basis, including but not limited to race, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, national origin, nationality or economic standing.

    JUSTICE: whereby transparent and accountable social, political, legal and economic systems work to benefit all, not just a privileged few; these systems are restructured or replaced when they fail to do so.

    ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP: whereby the wealth of our economy emerges from the health of our environment and therefore all societal activities are conducted with respect, humane treatment and foresight to ensure that all life is sustainable and that the world has room to flourish, now and for future generations.

    PEACE: whereby non-violence is embraced as a way of life, and we resolve to live together in harmony and celebrate principles of compassion, appreciation and respect for diversity and the differing views of others.

    It is not enough to know better; we must do better. Our social and political ideals have to be claimed and asserted by each generation.

    We look forward to a day when we can shift our focus beyond the notion of individual rights, towards a culture of sharing, where our love and compassion for each other and our world will be the only guides we need.

    We affirm our commitment to live this new world in our hearts and make it a reality.

  • Profile picture of OCCU-EVOLVE OCCU-EVOLVE439p said 4 months ago:

    THANK U PAT AND V&G TEAM! I was bogged down in another meeting but have 50 copies here…i KNEW WE were just about there!

  • Profile picture of jack siler jack siler105p said 4 months ago:

    Congratulations. Now, the minute the GA approves it (and do not take anything else for an answer) have not only our Press group and Media group primed to diffuse it, but it should go to the commercial press and media for release – including an internet siege.

  • Profile picture of Julianne Lutz Warren Julianne Lutz Warren4p said 4 months ago:

    I am loving this. There are just two phrases below, though, that I just don’t understand.

    ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP: whereby the wealth of our economy emerges from the health of our environment and therefore all societal activities are conducted with respect, humane treatment, and foresight to ensure that all life is sustainable and that the world has room to flourish, now and for future generations.

    Can we have enough foresight to ensure anything? Isn’t thinking that we can part of our present predicament…Isn’t what we mean that we need to proceed in how we relate to nature or the environment with humility and “precaution?”

    What does it mean to “ensure that all life is sustainable and that the world has room to flourish?” Who or what would be sustaining whom? and what room does the world as such need to flourish (the universe?)?…

    What about this: ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP: whereby the wealth of our economy emerges from the health of our environment and therefore all societal activities are conducted with respect, humane treatment, and precaution to ensure the ongoing capacity of Earth to sustain all life with room to flourish, now and for future generations.

  • Profile picture of David David54p said 4 months ago:

    I thought i’d have an issue with this document in one form or another, but I don’t. You guys did a great job covering all the bases of freedom and support.

    I just have one question – how does this affect the use of drugs? Because technically I could abuse the right of religion to get what I want, but I think that society should be allowed to responsibly use/experiment with the more natural drugs only (i.e. marijuana, shrooms, MDMA – ones that a person can still stay in control over, stop when they need to independently, and manage their lives appropriately with the right amount of education) as opposed to all others that only drive a person to addiction and dependence. I selected those three only because I stopped doing them on my own without help and without any problems or adverse effects – I have no idea if the same is possible with cocaine, but this would open up the ability to create crack, which is unacceptable. I’m unaware of any other drugs abilities to be independently controlled.

    My thinking is also, that if we are providing ourselves with these freedoms, pot and shrooms were here way before government and should be a freedom by default. MDMA is questionable because of it’s high compulsion to use (not addiction – compulsion), but then people are using high amounts because it’s illegal, they might never see it again, and those are the only doses they come in.

    Thoughts?

    I think this vision statement should be applied one way or another to our founding documents, that way we can have enough foresight to ensure everything if we can approach that foresight with the same intelligent consideration that was used to come up with this document.

  • Profile picture of Michael Korn Michael Korn22p said 4 months ago:

    Hey David, It would surprise me at all if the founding fathers found additional uses for hemp than the usual ones that were employed in the 18th century. Unfortunately, it didn’t make it into the Declaration or Constitution. Since we’ve been through so many battles to reach the point that we are at, I’d just say please let it go for now. As for ‘shrooms, stick to using the ‘Baby Bellas for now.” They’re lovely fried up with onions. Yum!

  • Profile picture of David David54p said 4 months ago:

    I see your point. Well made.

  • Profile picture of Eureka Springs Eureka Springs1p said 4 months ago:

    My quibble with this wonderful vision statement is we are not a democracy, we are a republic. The very word ‘democracy’ is not in our constitution. While I agree with the VS sentiment, I think we should quit (among ourselves) calling ourselves something which we are not. Only then can we as informed people address becoming one or not.

  • Profile picture of Raugh Mentyde Raugh Mentyde1p said 4 months ago:

    Spartacus’ agenda item: Build a new capitol building. The peoples republic capitol. Surround it with the most epically beautiful, functional city ever seeN. The art of Past with the innovation of the future. If you build it they will come, open city gates to all and encourage every citizen to come and participate in the political process. ONE dollar from every american gives us over 300mill. Theres a start, and uh, we all know who can afford to contribute a bit more than a buck. Figure you build the capitol as close to the geographical center of continental usa as you can safely do, and build cities round and round that point. Encourage a new model of human society where people live very close together, of course the City in some places will touch the clouds so plenty of room. Lots of public transit for mother earth. and people who enjoy more open range, well we have the rest of the country To live on. Solar panels, millions of them. Build build build!

  • Profile picture of Frank Frank said 4 months ago:

    Re: Need to Give People plenty of Fair Notice before cutting off Feedback on Vision.

    In response to Patrick’s big declaration that we are going to take the Vision statement to the GA on Tuesday, I see lots of unresolved items of feedback or proposed changes to the text. People have been saying that the draft is too long, that it needs to be tightened up, that items under one bullet-point heading often belong under another heading, or the headings are wrong, or bullet-points need to be consolidated, etc, etc. The list of concerns goes on and on, and it seems these issues have not been resolved. Even in Patrick’s email, there is mention by Patrick of having “frequently seen the same comment come up at multiple GAs,” which makes me wonder why these issues have not been resolved. Yet Patrick says the editing process is over and the time for making changes to the draft is finished.
    IF there was an announcement inviting us to submit our final proposed changes by a certain date, after which feedback or proposed changes would no longer be permitted, I guess we all missed that announcement.
    For months, the Vision&Goals group has talked about wanting to put forth a Vision in a way that makes people happy and takes everyone’s feedback into account, but if we refuse to take into account all the remaining feedback and changes that people still have, that will go against everything we have said. That would not look good.
    We should continue to allow feedback and proposals for changes until we set a cutoff date and give people plenty of advance notice of that cutoff date, like we did the last time we proposed to stop collecting feedback back in mid-December. Back in December, there were lots of notices advising people to submit their feedback and proposed changes by Midnight on Saturday Dec.17, after which time we would stop taking feedback. Even though we ultimately reversed course and went back to collecting feedback after that date, that seemed like the right way to do it so that people would not be blindsided the way they seem to be now.
    We also need to reach a meaningful consensus within the Vision&Goals group on the final version we will submit to the GA, and I don’t mean consensus at a small meeting attended by only a dozen or so members, but rather at a big meeting attended by at least 30 or 40 members, similar to the monumental Saturday, Nov.19 V&G meeting attended by some 40-50 people where we hammered out the final details of an earlier Vision statement. Interestingly enough, at the Dec.18 V&G meeting, we consensed upon a proposal which involved calling for Sunday, January 8, 2012, to be an extended “do or die” working session for everyone to attend and to work through any and all issues until the Vision statement is completed, and we agreed we would basically commit to working as long as it takes on that day until the job is done. Unfortunately, that proposal was ignored and never carried out by the small handful of people who seem to control most every meeting. There was also Vision language that we worked on which was subsequently ignored as well. (see Minutes for 12/18/2011 Vision & Goals Meeting at http://www.nycga.net/groups/vision-and-goals/docs/vision-goals-12182011-meeting-minutes.)*
    I propose we announce in advance a final V&G working group session where we call for everyone to attend and to bring their proposed changes and we will address all unresolved items and reach a consensus within the V&G group on a final Vision to take to the GA. This need not significantly extend our time frame. But anything less than this would undermine the claims we have been making these past months about wanting to take everyone’s ideas and feedback into account. I fully expect to hear from the usual handful of people, but I would very like to hear from other members of the group outside that tiny handful. This concerns everyone, so please weigh in with your thoughts. Thank you. –Frank
    * * *
    Vision language from the Dec.18 V&G meeting which was subsequently ignored and should be taken into account before any finalized version is put forth:
    PREAMBLE: We, the people of Occupy Wall Street, in solidarity with the peoples of the world, gather to reaffirm our inalienable rights. Our political and economic systems are broken. Corruption is rampant and our political representatives are for sale to the highest bidders. Our government is no longer one “of the people, by the people, and for the people.” Today, we must remember the lessons of history, restore human dignity, and begin anew to build the bonds of trust and goodwill among all. From the General Assembly to the people of the world, we offer a Declaration of our Vision.

    SELF-GOVERNMENT: whereby we, the people, come together and solve our problems by consensus, all are encouraged to take on civic responsibility and participate in decision making, and the use of General Assemblies by the people, where all voices are welcome to be heard, is expanded to every level of decision making, bringing people together locally, nationally, and even worldwide;

    For a draft which attempts to make many of the consolidations needed into a much tighter 1-page Vision, see: http://www.nycga.net/groups/vision-and-goals/docs/proposed-condensed-alternate-vision-statement

  • Profile picture of jack siler jack siler105p said 4 months ago:

    Frank, I like your preamble. The problem is that you were never there when everything else was discussed so you just keep repeating what YOU see. For one example, you’ve left off the JUSTICE paragraph, vital because it’s the only place where replacing the system if it cannot be fixed is mentioned. Your “tightening” is in your head. It’s already been squeezed and stripped and the GA gave its preliminary approval. You have been heard. Everyone has been heard. What’s there in the V&G final version is the concensed version. If you can’t live with concensus democracy, join the 99% corporation of Mr. Pollock. They aren’t stuck with concensus and they need members.

  • Profile picture of Chithra KarunaKaran Chithra KarunaKaran-21p said 4 months ago:

    great draft, thx to ALL who worked directly and indirectly to make it happen, looking fwd to J24 consensus — chithra karunakaran [ethical democracy]

  • Just a couple of points. All in all, it works. Personally, I would fix the things that are fixable and remove the things that aren’t.

    PEOPLE BEFORE PROFIT: whereby we value human dignity and needs over monetary gain, elevating them to a place of primary importance; among these are the rights to meaningful and fairly rewarded work; a decent home; abundant sources of clean air, pure water and natural, nutritious food supplies; and free, comprehensive healthcare and education;

    You have intermingled subjective and unrealistic concepts with actual needs and have not defined who or how you expect these from. Do you request this from an employer? “meaningful and fairly rewarded work; a decent home” subjective while “abundant sources of clean air, pure water and natural, nutritious food supplies; and free, comprehensive healthcare and education” are real necessities. All of these hings are directly proportionate to the amount of work/effort one is willing to expend to get them.

    Who pays for “meaningful and fairly rewarded work; a decent home; nutritious food supplies” for people that are not willing to work? These things I am happy to pay for with my taxes [income and property] “abundant sources of clean air, pure water and natural, nutritious food supplies [any and all children]; and free, comprehensive healthcare and education“.

    The problem is that if you try and do so much that it creates an imbalance in the perception of your goal(s) you alienate your supporters. Why would the OWS not seek to change the constitution, the basis for all rights in the United States? My first goal would be to make a change from which all goals can be achieved.

    JUSTICE: whereby transparent and accountable social, political, legal, and economic systems work to benefit all, not just a privileged few; these systems are restructured or replaced when they fail to do so;

    This is going to be a very real problem with the fox guarding the hen house. The Judges and the Courts are the primary reason that this country is so screwed up. It is the Courts that gave this Country to the Corporation through their laziness and greed.


    Nobody Important

    http://www.nycga.net/groups/political-and-electoral-reform/docs/amendment-28-status-of-created-entities

    http://www.nycga.net/groups/political-and-electoral-reform/docs/amendment-29-publics-right-to-know

    http://www.nycga.net/groups/political-and-electoral-reform/docs/amendment-30-holiday-voting-act

  • Profile picture of Andrew Mallis Andrew Mallis20p said 4 months ago:

    What are “canyons of wealth” and how do we gather in them? Does wealth only exist in canyons? Is this a particular type of wealth? Are you trying to invert mountains of wealth? Do you mean there are mountains of wealth in NYC and we are walking between them? Those would be valleys of poverty…

    I don’t think the metaphor works.

  • Profile picture of OCCU-EVOLVE OCCU-EVOLVE439p said 4 months ago:

    The area in and around Wall Street and Liberty Plaza (where the GA IS HELD and our movement started are near the canyons of wealth…there is NOTHING of that area that ‘reeks’ of poverty…except we occupiers and the low paid workers of fast food joints…